Afternoon D & C Dedicated To Mumbai
Home > Edit > Rahul’s Congress in disarray: lurching right and left to regain relevance

Rahul’s Congress in disarray: lurching right and left to regain relevance

Monday, April 04, 2016
By Virendra Kapoor

Confusion can alienate secular constituency without winning new allies

First, the self-avowedly secular Congress  took the lead in expelling  a member of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen from  the Maharasthra Assembly because he refused to chant Bharat Mata Ki Jai, though he was ready to shout  Jai Hind. The Shiv Sena, the BJP and the Congress found themselves  on the same page in insisting on his saying Jai to Bharat Mata. Anyone refusing to shout that slogan was a lesser patriot in their view. There could be no compromise on putting every citizen through that litmus test for establishing that he was one hundred percent loyal to Bharat Mata. Period.

A few days later, to further embellish its credentials as a patriotic force, the Congress  again tried to outdo BJP on the question of national interest and security. This time it picked on the visit of a team from Pakistan to see for themselves the scene of the recent terror attack in Pathankot. Here it had the newbie Aam Aadmi Party for company.  

At least in the case of AAP  it can be explained  that unencumbered by any  pedigree the opportunistic gaggle of self-seekers remains ever eager to pick any issue which might help it raise its media profile. The party thrives on the oxygen of publicity, duly paid for by the hapless Delhiites who can only grin and bear it while they build a cult around the crafty Arvind Kejriwal at a cost of over Rs. 500 crores.  Now they even advertise their wares in Gujarat and Maharashtra at Delhiites costs but the Delhi High Court seems to be in no hurry to dispose of the PIL challenging the astronomical rise in the publicity budget by the Kejriwal Government.   

But to get back to the  Congress, The party has a long history, and, at least since Independence, it has pointedly nurtured the minority constituency, even if it is for purely electoral reasons. What, then, explains its  rightward lurch, virtually trying to appropriate the Sangh parivar platform and thus risk alienation of the so-called secular vote? Could it be that the party has concluded that the Muslim vote is beyond its reach, it having drifted towards  the Asaduddin Owaisis and Badruddin Ajmals of the rising Muslim League-type outfits, and, therefore, it must try and adopt an aggressive posture on security and patriotism to tap into the Hindu vote a la the BJP?

Maybe the  contrary ideological signaling is actually a reflection of the disarray and confusion that prevails in the party owing to the immaturity and inexperience  of the de facto boss Rahul Gandhi. We believe the second to be closer to the truth. Having made the old guard  irrelevant, the  Gandhi scion relies on nouveau politicians who, like him, lack grounding in politics. So, the Rahul Congress seems to craft a response to current issues, as it goes along,  uninformed by the party’s long history and ideological moorings.  

That would explain the shrill noises against the visit by Pakistan’s Pathankot team. Now, the visitors, even if they were all from the ISI, which they weren’t, could not have taken away anything which we wanted to hide from them. Nor could  they have possibly stolen any new secrets from the airbase which they did not already know. In these days of aerial  and online  imagery there is a lot available at the click of a mouse. And that which was not to be shown to the visitors under any circumstances, they could not have seen because their movement was restricted and strictly monitored by our sleuths. Of course it was utter nonsense to suggest that the country’s security was compromised by retracing the Pathankot attack for the benefit of  Pakistan’s investigators. The visitors could not, did not, just  wander off wherever their fancy took them. No.

But look at the pluses from  the visit.  To begin with, it immediately denied Pakistan the excuse that it had no access to the scene of crime and, therefore,  it cannot follow  up with its nationals back home who had hatched the conspiracy. Courts in Pakistan are more likely to attach weight to their own investigators who had independently visited the scene of crime and satisfied themselves with the facts. To that extent the defence of the accused will get devalued.

Another gain could be much bigger. Unlike 26/11 and other such terrorist acts, when Pakistan had stonewalled action against known conspirators on the ground that it had no direct knowledge about the crimes, India could in the near-future get access to  Masood Azahar in Pakistan for his alleged role in the Pathankot attack. If that happens, and such an outcome cannot be  ruled out, Indian investigators will get a rare opportunity to interrogate the terror-mastermind whose jihadi outfit, Jaish-e-Mohammad, was said to be behind several terrorist attacks. In any case, even if Pakistan denies access to Azhar, the visit by Pakistan’s investigators gives India an upper hand legally and politically  to counter the culture of deniability that Islamabad has so far fostered  in the wake of previous jihadi atrocities. Denying Pakistan an opportunity for deniability is no mean gain by itself, is it?  

Also, critics of the Modi Government vis a vis the visit of Pakistan’s team make a serious mistake. For questioning the ruling party’s patriotism cannot, will not, yield any dividend. Nationalism, nay, ~desh bhkati’ is the Sangh parivar’s strongest suit. Its members wear their patriotism on their sleeve. In the popular mind it will be hard to dilute the image of  BJP  as anything less than an ultra nationalist party. The Congress cannot easily replicate the BJP DNA

Any attempt to do so can only result in the Congress forfeiting whatever little support it might still enjoy among  the dominant minority community. An aggressive display of hyper-nationalism puts off even the most level-headed and patriotic Muslims.  Having cultivated the minority constituency all these years by abusing the BJP for being `communal,’ the Rahul Gandhi Congress risks losing it without there being any hope of his  denting the BJP’s nationalist image.  

The Congress’s embrace of hyper-nationalism in opposition ignores the fact that the saffron party has always been pragmatic while in power. Vajpayee as foreign minister in the Morarji Desai Government back in 1977 had set that template  when he virtually persisted with what he had previously critiqued as the Nehruvian foreign policy. Modi has Vajpayee’s excellent record to guide him when he extends the olive branch to our perennially hostile neighbor.  But in case the Congress has decided to adopt soft Hindutva under Rahul Gandhi it should consider the folly of supporting Kanahiya Kumar’s clarion call for ` azadi’ one day, and make Bharat Mata Ki Jai as a test-case for patriotism the next. That way, you end up losing  your present friends without   making  new ones.

If Azhar, why not Sreesanth?  
The BJP decision to field the scam-tainted cricketer S. Sreesanth for the Thiruvanthapuram seat in the on-going Assembly election in Kerala has raised eyebrows in the local unit of the party. Though he is popular with the youth, and was duly acquitted by the Delhi High Court in the match-fixing case, he still remains banned by the BCCI. Besides, giving him Thiruvanthapuram seat has  not gone down well with a section of the party. In all of Kerala, if there is one seat that the party can expect to win to make its maiden entry into the State Assembly it is Thiruvanthapuram .   Meanwhile, the Congress is hardly in a position to object to Sreesanth’s entry into politics, it having earlier rewarded former Indian captain Mohammed Azharuddin with a Lok Sabha seat, though he too was banned from playing cricket by the BCCI for alleged match-fixing.

Desperate for a RS seat
Remember Amar Singh?  The one-time alter ego of the Samajwadi Supremo Mulayam Singh Yadav is desperate for a rapprochement so that he can regain entry into the Rajya Sabha. With seven seats up for grabs from UP, Singh would like nothing better than to be given one so that he can bounce back into politics. But if Yadav himself is keen to oblige him, there are a legion in the SP who deadest against him. Samajwadi Party’s Muslim face, Azam Khan, throws an angry fit at the mere suggestion of his sworn foe being accommodated yet again. Why, Jaya Bachchan cannot be pleased at the prospect of Singh’s return, given that only last week Amar Singh in a television interview revealed quite a few shady deals  of Amitabh Bachchan  accompanied by   gratuitous advice to the authorities to pry open the account-books of the superstar. It is another matter that Singh most likely was the chief facilitator in helping his Bade Bhai out of the mess in which he had found himself when he first launched his eponymously named business enterprise, Amitabh Bachchan Corporation Ltd.

No Comments Posted
City news
BJP emerges more powerful and dominant as NDA ...
Going by the official trends of the Election ...
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thacke
I am in a fix. I have been happily married for 4
Dr. Rajan B. Bhonsle, M.D. (Bom)
Consulting Sex Therapist & Counsellor
Dr. (Mrs.) Minnu R. Bhonsle, Ph.D.
Consulting Psychotherapist & Counsellor
Select Sun sign:
Aries (Mar 21 - Apr 20)
Aries (Mar 21 - Apr 20)You are likely to remain careful and watchful today, foretells Ganesha. And because you'll be invited to parties and other social events, your enthusiasm will remain buoyant. You will also strike the right balance between business and pleasure, says Ganesha.
- Advertising -
Read More